FY26 K-12 Funding: Uncertainty as a Structural Reality
Complexity has always defined K–12 funding cycles. For districts planning for FY26, that complexity has evolved into a structural condition. Securing reliable funding now requires navigating an environment where timing, eligibility requirements, and implementation rules remain in motion.
K–12 finance continues to operate as a layered mix of federal, state, and local dollars. District administrators are well versed in formula grants, maintenance-of-effort thresholds, compliance reporting, and staggered application windows. What has changed is the planning equation.
District leaders are no longer asking only:
- When will funds be released?
- What conditions will govern their use?
- How stable are allocations across fiscal years?
Federal Movement: Incremental but Impactful
Recent federal action has introduced additional variables into the FY26 planning horizon. Legislation signed into law provides $79 billion for the U.S. Department of Education from February 4 through September 30, including an increase of approximately $217 million over projected FY25 levels, according to reporting from K–12 Dive.
The legislation requires states and districts to submit formula grant proposals at congressionally dictated levels. At the same time, discussions continue around the potential reallocation of certain program responsibilities to other federal departments.
Further clarification followed during recent national remarks, when the Department of Education outlined how implementation of expected changes would proceed. In a press release, Education Secretary Linda McMahon confirmed that interagency agreements had been signed to facilitate program delivery and administrative coordination.
The stated objective is to streamline federal education activities and reduce administrative burdens while maintaining program continuity. For districts, however, even incremental changes in governance or oversight can affect timelines, reporting structures, and fiscal predictability.
Contextual Risk Signals
Several recent events illustrate how quickly funding dynamics can shift:
- $6.2 billion in federal K–12 funding for FY25 was temporarily withheld in July 2025
- Represented approximately 14.4% of the prior-year Department of Education budget
- Resulted in delayed staffing decisions, postponed program rollouts, and revised long-term planning assumptions
Temporary withholding events create operational ripple effects, particularly for districts operating with limited reserves.
Legal challenges also continue to surface. In Wisconsin, a coalition of parents, educators, and districts filed suit against the State Legislature over alleged underfunding and failure to account for inflation. Similar litigation has emerged in Kentucky, New Hampshire, and Wyoming, all centered on funding formulas and adequacy standards.
These developments reinforce a broader reality: funding mechanisms remain subject to both policy and judicial scrutiny.
Infrastructure Pressures Remain Elevated
Funding volatility occurs alongside sustained infrastructure demand.
The State of Our Schools 2025 report ranks K-12 education second only to highways in total public infrastructure capital outlay nationwide. Much of this investment is financed through long-term debt, repaid annually through district operating budgets.
The report characterizes state and federal infrastructure support as varied, unstable, and insufficient relative to documented need. Federal intervention frequently follows disaster events rather than proactive modernization cycles. FEMA awarded nearly $13 billion to school districts between FY13 and FY23. This is substantial funding that nevertheless addresses only a portion of long-term capital requirements.
Facilities modernization, HVAC replacement, safety upgrades, technology infrastructure expansion, and compliance-driven renovations all depend on predictable funding streams. Volatility complicates multi-year capital planning and debt structuring.
Spending Growth and Expanded Expectations
Despite federal volatility, aggregate K-12 spending continues to trend upward.
Long-Term Funding Trends (2002–2023)
- 35.8% increase in public K-12 funding
- $946.5 billion in total nationwide funding in 2023
- Per-pupil spending increased from $14,969 to $20,322
(Source: Reason Foundation, K-12 Education Spending Spotlight)
Spending growth has coincided with expanded expectations:
- Enhanced school safety and security obligations
- Increased mental health and student support services
- Expanded cybersecurity and technology integration requirements
- Greater compliance, transparency, and reporting standards
Higher funding levels do not necessarily translate into discretionary flexibility. Many allocations remain restricted, time-bound, or program-specific.
Planning in a Persistent State of Flux
Volatility in K-12 finance has shifted from episodic disruption to ongoing condition.
District leaders preparing for FY26 are emphasizing:
- Diversified funding strategies
- Scenario-based budgeting models
- Early identification of grant opportunities
- Multi-year forecasting that accounts for timing risk
- Alignment between operational priorities and eligible funding categories
Districts that integrate uncertainty into their baseline assumptions are better positioned to absorb timing delays, policy adjustments, and allocation changes.
Disciplined financial governance, proactive grant strategy, and long-term infrastructure planning have become operational requirements within the FY26 funding landscape.
Grant Finder State Spotlight: New York
New York’s vast network of K-12 schools spend an average of $33,437 per pupil, totaling approximately $84.7 billion annually.
- Federal funding: $6.17 billion ($2,438 per pupil)
- State funding: $30.8 billion ($12,152 per pupil)
- Local funding: $48.2 billion ($19,046 per pupil)
As illustrated in the chart above, most of the K-12 funding in New York comes from state and local sources, rather than federal dollars.
Funding disparities across states remain one of the defining features of the national K-12 landscape. On average, federal dollars account for approximately 13.6% of total K-12 funding per state, according to FY24 financials. At the same time, education leaders widely acknowledge that overall U.S. K-12 funding trails certain global benchmarks. Funding requirements, however, vary significantly by state based on enrollment, cost of living, infrastructure demands, and local revenue capacity.
New York provides a clear example of how funding distribution can diverge from national averages.
The state educates approximately 5.1% of all K-12 students in the United States, yet receives roughly 9.7% of total national K-12 funding. With nearly 2.5 million students and a student-to-teacher ratio of approximately 12:1, New York ranks first nationally in both overall spending and per-pupil funding.
In 2021, New York schools received approximately $15,500 more per student than the national average. Total statewide funding currently equals roughly $85.2 billion annually, or $33,635 per pupil. The gap between funding and actual spending is estimated at $509.9 million statewide, or about $198 per student.
From a taxpayer perspective, New York relies heavily on state and local contributions. About 4.9% of taxpayer income. Compared to federal sources, which account for roughly 0.38%.
The “Big Five” and Funding Complexity
New York’s funding profile reflects both population density and structural complexity. The state’s five largest districts, New York City, Buffalo, Rochester, Syracuse, and Yonkers, are often referred to as the “Big Five.” Unlike most districts in the state, these systems are fiscally dependent on their municipal governments and do not operate as independent taxing authorities.
This structure influences how funds are allocated between wealthier and lower-income districts, particularly in urban centers where revenue capacity and student need may diverge significantly.
The Foundation Aid Model
K-12 funding in New York is overseen by the New York State Education Department (NYSED) and relies heavily on state aid combined with local property tax revenue. Federal funds account for a relatively small portion of the overall funding structure, averaging around 4% annually.
The largest component of state aid is the Foundation Aid program, introduced in 2007. Foundation Aid is designed to ensure every district can provide a “sound basic education.” In FY25, Foundation Aid represented approximately 71% of total state aid and about 40% of overall district funding.
The formula includes four primary components:
- Adjusted Foundation Amount (AFA): A state-specified per-pupil expenditure level.
- Expected Minimum Local Contribution: The required local share based on property wealth and income metrics.
- Total Aidable Foundation Pupil Units (TAFPU): A weighted count of eligible students.
- Total Foundation Aid Calculation: Derived from the interaction of the above components.
The model allocates more resources to high-need districts by accounting for property values, income levels, enrollment, student demographics, and regional cost differences.
New York also operates a “Save Harmless” provision, ensuring that districts do not receive less state aid than in the prior year even if enrollment declines.
The Role of Local Revenue
Local revenue represents approximately 56% of total K-12 funding in a typical year. Property taxes serve as the primary revenue driver for most districts, with annual tax levies subject to voter approval.
A statewide Property Tax Cap generally limits levy growth to around 2% annually. The Big Five districts operate differently, as their budgets are embedded within broader municipal fiscal structures.
This combination of local control and municipal dependency creates a funding landscape that is both robust and complex.
Transparency and Oversight
NYSED publishes annual financial reports analyzing district expenditures, state aid levels, and long-term fiscal trends. These reports provide administrators and policymakers with a detailed view of how funding allocations align with district needs.
Independent research organizations, including the Fiscal Policy Institute, also monitor funding formula changes and their impact across districts.
Public education in New York accounts for more than 25% of total state operating spending and approximately 40% of local government spending, making it the largest public expenditure category statewide.
Where School Safety Fits In
The expiration of ESSER funding has intensified pressure on districts to sustain digital infrastructure and school safety initiatives without federal relief dollars.
According to the recent SETDA 2025 State EdTech Trends Report:
- Funding is the single largest unmet need for school districts
- Only 6% of districts plan to sustain initiatives previously supported by ESSER (down from 27%)
- Top technology priorities for the coming school year include:
- Artificial Intelligence (17%)
- Cybersecurity (16%)
- Broadband (16%)
Source: SETDA 2025 State EdTech Trends Report
As a result, school safety now intersects directly with operational, instructional, and workforce planning priorities, making grants and alternative funding sources increasingly strategic for New York districts planning for FY26 and beyond.
Grant Finder: Federal Opportunities
Below is a curated list of federal programs likely to be relevant for New York districts entering FY26.
Application windows vary and the majority of FY26 deadlines have not been confirmed (at time of writing). However, a good rule of thumb is to look at the posting or closing dates for each of these federal grants in the previous year and plan the application accordingly.
As we noted above, the current administration has recently signed legislation that provides the Education Department with agreed funding into law. With that in mind, it is reasonable to assume that existing or long-standing grant programs are already under DOE review and subject to an agreed application timeline.
DOJ STOP Grant
- Due Date: Currently closed, will reopen in 2026
- Eligibility: Public, private, and charter K-12 schools
- Grant Website: https://bja.ojp.gov/funding/opportunities/o-bja-2025-172466
- Description: Provides funding to prevent and reduce school violence by implementing training, developing school threat assessment teams and/or intervention teams to identify violence risks, introducing technologies like anonymous reporting tools, or applying other school safety strategies that assist in preventing violence. The goal is to equip K–12 students, teachers, and staff with tools to recognize, respond to, and prevent acts of violence.
COPS SVPP Grant
- Due Date: Currently closed, will open again in 2026
- Eligibility: School districts (including public charter schools and school districts with a single school), school boards, law enforcement
- Grant Website: School Violence Prevention Program (SVPP) | COPS OFFICE
- Description: Provides up to 75% in funding for a variety of school safety measures in and around K-12 schools and grounds, including:
- Coordination with law enforcement
- Training for local law enforcement officers to prevent student violence against others and self
- Metal detectors, locks, lighting, and other deterrent measures
- Technology for expedited notification of local law enforcement during an emergency, or any other measures that the COPS Office determines may provide a significant improvement in security
Homeland Security Grant Program (HSGP)
- Due Date: Eligible Applicants are advised to contact their State Administration Agency (SAA) if interested in grant funding
- Eligibility: State, local, tribal, and territorial governments, as well as nonprofits (subrecipients)
- Grant Website: https://www.fema.gov/grants/preparedness/homeland-security
- Description: Allowable expenses include materials to conduct planning, engagement, and volunteer management activities; interoperable communications equipment; measures to increase physical security; training conferences; and more.
State HSGP
- Due Date: Contact SAA for application dates and eligibility requirements
- Eligibility: Local law enforcement, as well as nonprofits (subrecipients)
- Grant Website: State Administrative Agency (SAA) Contacts | FEMA.gov
- Description: Administered by FEMA, the SHSP is part of the broader Homeland Security Grant Program (HSGP). It provides funding to state, local, tribal, and territorial governments to enhance their ability to prevent, protect against, respond to, and recover from terrorist attacks and other emergencies. You must apply through your State Administrative Agency (SAA) and cannot apply directly to FEMA. Not all states permit schools to apply, so check with your SAA for more details. Funds are allocated based on risk assessments and the effectiveness of proposed initiatives.
- Key focus areas: Planning, Equipment Acquisition, Training and Exercises
Nonprofit Security Grant Program (NSGP)
- Due Date: Contact the New York Office of the Governor, Homeland Security Grants Division
- Eligibility: Nonprofit 501(c)(3) organizations (subrecipients)
- Grant Website: https://www.fema.gov/grants/preparedness/nonprofit-security
- Description: Allowable expenses include identification, assessment, and reporting of threats of violence; improving cybersecurity of access control, identity verification systems, and security technologies; security training for employees; and more.
Stronger Connections Grant Program
- Due Date: Not Applicable
- Eligibility: State Educational Agencies
- Grant Website: Stronger Connections Grant (SCG) | U.S. Department of Education
- Description: A core component of the 2022 Bipartisan Safer Communities Act, the SCGP provides funding for local communities and leaders to improve schools’ climate and student achievement. The program awards funds to local education authorities that integrate evidence-based approaches to safe, supportive, and healthy schools. These can include security measures, wellness initiatives, safety planning and associated school safety training.
It should be noted that FY26 application deadlines for a number of federal grants that specifically fund school safety programs can either vary or have not been announced.
The expectation is that these will be confirmed in the near future, albeit this is contingent on if and when the DOE is finally dismantled by the current administration.
Politico reported that the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has been tapped to take over any work or grants related to school shootings, while the State Department is going to take a role in how funding is distributed. In addition, the news source said, the DOE is laser-focused on “returning education to the states,” with the HHS now responsible for grants for mental health programs that the administration (unsuccessfully) tried to end in 2025.
HHS’ expanded funding portfolio will also include the School Emergency Response to Violence program – Project SERV. This program pays for short term education-related services for LEAs to help them recover from a violent or traumatic event in which the learning environment has been disrupted and is allocated on a case-by-case basis.
Provided that proposed changes to how federal funding is administered become government policy in the near future, then school administrators should ensure that they sign up for programs that are of interest at SchoolSafety.gov to ensure that they receive updates on new school safety-related grant opportunities when the window opens again for FY26.
In addition, there is an official website designed to simplify the federal grant application and eligibility process – Grants.gov – which is filled with resources and helpful tips. This website is flagged up on the NSGP webpage, although it has dated content and deadline dates that are either passed or TBD.
State & Non-Federal Funding Pathways
Under the most recent enacted budget, K-12 funding continues to increase.
- Total School Aid (FY25): $37.6 billion
- Foundation Aid (FY25): $26.4 billion
- Year-over-year increases: $1.7 billion (Total Aid) and $1.4 billion (Foundation Aid)
Early proposals from the Board of Regents indicate an additional $1.1 billion increase for FY26, with targeted allocations toward:
- Universal pre-K expansion
- Career and technical education
- Equity initiatives in underserved districts
Additional statewide investments such as teacher salary adjustments and expanded school meal programs also influence operational funding capacity.
NYSED’s Grants Finance department administers both state and federal grants, overseeing compliance, reporting, and fiscal integrity for awarded funds.
Smart Schools Bond Act & Safety Investments
In 2024, New York approved $27 million in Smart Schools Bond Act funding, aimed at modernizing digital infrastructure and supporting school safety initiatives. Eligible investments included:
- Entry control systems
- Video security systems
- Emergency notification tools
Certain technologies, including facial recognition systems and “self-learning analytic software,” appear to be excluded under current guidance.
Alyssa’s Law in New York
New York enacted Alyssa’s Law in June 2022, requiring schools to implement silent panic alarm systems and related emergency protocols. Schools may deploy these systems through smartphone applications, wearable devices, or fixed hardware installations.
The legislation integrates emergency notification directly into school safety infrastructure and reflects a broader shift toward standardized rapid-response tools nationwide.
A Model of Scale and Stability
New York’s K-12 funding structure reflects incremental reform within a longstanding framework that combines strong state aid with substantial local revenue.
While funding levels exceed national averages, districts continue to navigate legislative discussions, compliance obligations, and targeted program allocations. As in other states, disciplined planning, careful monitoring of aid formulas, and proactive grant strategy remain essential to maintaining fiscal stability and advancing long-term educational goals.
Foundation & Private Sector Opportunities
Districts may also access safety-aligned funds through mission-driven organizations, including:
Subscription search engines (GrantWatch, GrantPortal) offer additional visibility, though often behind paywalls. The CDW Education Funding webpage is also a good resource for state-specific grant programs, although it also requires the end user to login via its email provider to access the full database of resources and K-12 funding opportunities.
Applying Strategically
Grants are competitive and time-bounded. The strongest applications connect:
- Mission → Solution → Measurable Benefit → Implementation Readiness
Kokomo24/7® supports districts in mapping funding opportunities to student safety and operational goals. Our team assists with identification, strategy alignment, and application support.
The Outlook for FY26 and Beyond
In light of recent positive developments (from a funding and allocation standpoint, crucially) at the U.S. Department of Education, it is clear that the FY26 landscape is not defined by lack of funds. Rather, it continues to be beholden to complexity and an increased level of uncertainty as to how the federal funding process will both evolve and its impact on long-standing funding channels.
With that in mind, school districts and K-12 administrators willing to diversify funding streams, anticipate federal shifts, and accelerate grant strategies will be better positioned to support safety, innovation, and student outcomes in not only the year ahead but also FY27 and beyond. Funding for K-12 schools is a constant conversation, what matters is having the right partner at the right time to steer you down the right path.
About Kokomo24/7®
Kokomo Solutions, Inc. (Kokomo24/7®) is an enterprise B2B software company founded and based in Chicago, IL featuring a flexible software platform with proven solutions around health, safety, and operational use cases serving over 100 enterprise clients, including many education institutions, corporations, and municipalities.
Kokomo24/7® offers schools and workplaces a holistic platform for health, safety, and operational efficiency. Most organizations are inundated with fragmented solutions and struggle to provide streamlined services. Adopt a platform that can grow with you.
Request a demo to see the flexibility of the Kokomo24/7® platform for yourself!
CASES™
ESCALATE™
TRIAGE™
NOTIFY™
FORMS™
ANALYTICS™
HOST™
OWLPASS®
ACCESS™
WELLNESS™
CREDENTIALS™
